DATA
HOLDERS

Data holder collect or generate data that can be both a by-product or a main product. It is quite likely that entities belonging to this group exploit their data for decision making. They typically use technologies and services provided by solution providers for data generation, acquisition, processing and aggregation. Not only companies but also, for instance, academic institutions or government bodies may be data holders.

ARTEFACTS



DATA



TOOLS
TECH

Organizational assets are those resources from which future economic benefit is expected. Data is such an asset of the data economy’s actors. Data can be described along six dimensions, which are source, content, format, terms of use, purpose and position in the data value chain. Data has features that evoke certain behaviour from the data economy’s actors but it usually does not have purposes of its own or powers of reproduction.

  • Content

    Concerning content, three different types of data were identified. Actor data includes person data (e.g., address, medical details, transactions, communications) and organisation data (e.g., address, business facts, position, transactions, communications). Device/service data contains among others usage, configuration and status data. Environment data refers, for instance, to nature (e.g., trees in a forest), public infrastructure (e.g., streets in a city) or economic data.

  • Format

    With respect to the format of data, a very general differentiation is made between structured and unstructured data. However, a more thorough understanding of the format is essential to allow the exploitation of data. The interpretation of data is only possible for an entity if it is known how the data was encoded for storage or transmission. XML, CSV, JSON and RDF are data formats often used to exchange data.

  • Terms of use

    Terms of use describe under what circumstances data can be used. Open data is freely available to everyone to use and republish without restrictions from copyright, patens of other mechanisms of control – i.e., there are no specific terms of use. Use of data, however, may be restricted by making data available for charge or restricting access to registered members or customers. The terms of use of data made available to third parties are determined by the respective data holder’s or distributor’s business strategy and model.

  • Purpose

    Purpose refers to the main goal for which data is intended to be used. Audience data is an example for data described with respect to its purpose dimension. In terms of content, audience data is actor or device/service data. Its purpose is to provide insight into the audience of some activity.

  • Position in the data value chain

    The position in the value chain of data indicates what has happened with the data so far as well as what are likely steps to follow to exploit the data. Terms used to describe data based on this dimension include raw data, for instance.

Technologies are key assets of data economy’s actors as they are the resources from which future economic benefit is expected. Technologies contribute to the economic value generation by exploiting the potentials of the data available. Tools are considered as compositions of technologies that serve a specific purpose.

  • Purpose

    The purpose identifies the main goal of a technology. For example, data storage solutions usually help to preserve and manage data and its lifecycle. Other purposes include to provide security (e.g., AES, TLS) or to allow data exchange (e.g., JSON, XML) or notifications (push, pull solutions). Data economy actors usually combine multiple technologies.

  • Openness

    Openness describes the possibility to access and extend technologies. Technologies may be fully proprietary, commercial and closed, or follow an open-source approach or be positioned somewhere in between those extremes.

  • Usage

    Usage reflects the distribution of technologies, which is often represented by the number of users. Technologies may be standardised but still barely used in practice, while others may be de-facto standards. Examples are XML and JSON, which are used by most data economy actors these days and thus have a large usage within the market.

  • Simplicity

    Although simplicity is hard to measure and partially subjective, it has been found that technologies that are usable in an easy way are typically used more often. For example, a major success factor of REST services has been their simplicity in contrast with other formats.

  • Trend factor

    Trends and new approaches play a key role in the data economy. Modern and trendy technologies are often quickly taken up and used in contrast to old and sometimes more mature technologies. In data storage, for instance, NoSQL solutions such as MongoDB have gained popularity over traditional storages over the last couple of years. However, trends can also be identified in newer fields such as virtualisation.

STRATEGIES

Strategies describe how agents react to their surroundings and pursue goals. They include deliberate choice but also patterns of response that pursue goals with little or no deliberation. Assessment of the success of own actions and the actions and success of other actors influence the change of strategies. Processes of reproduction and copying play an important role in the context of strategies. In the context of the data economy, strategies of actors are closely related to their business models.

  • Data acquisition

    Actors focusing on data acquisition typically address very specific data in terms of content and their value propositions emphasise the access to this data. They publish raw data or interpretations of data, provide better access to or search engines for data or run platforms for data exchange. Demand-oriented pricing strategies are typically used for revenue generation, where the fee is sometimes linked to specific indicators. It also happens that data holders must pay actors to make their data available.

  • Data manipulation

    Actors using data manipulation as core of their business model typically provide technologies or services for generating, analysing, visualising, managing or enriching data. In terms of value proposition, they predominately stress the performance, design or usability of their offers. With respect to revenue generation, subscription fees are typically charged. Implementing a premium model is quite common, while some actors implement a freemium model.

  • Data exploitation

    Actors focusing on data exploitation do not only manipulate third-party data or provide technologies to do so but also exploit data themselves. They typically use data to create new products and services, improve existing ones, add data to non-data products or produce market analyses, surveys, plans and reports. Most actors charge their customers subscription fees. Actors usually highlight the newness of their offers, their experience in the field or performance aspects in their value proposition.

  • Technology provision

    Actors using technology provision as basis of their business model typically provide technology-based services (e.g., a cloud-based analytics service) or technologies (e.g., a NoSQL storage solution). For technology-based services, subscription fees are typically charged, while in case of technology the products themselves are often made available free of charge and fee-based services are offered related to them. Nevertheless, there are also quite some technologies or tools that need to be licensed or bought.

  • Consultation

    Actors focusing on consultation typically provide consulting on how to benefit from data, how to build a successful data-based business model or how to use data technology, data-related trainings or courses, or data skill management. The value propositions are usually focused on the experience the respective actor has. Consulting companies typically charge a fee for their services. The amount of the fee is usually fixed individually.

Brokerage fee
Renting Asset sale
Advertising Leasing
Licensing Usage fee
Subscription fee Lending










%

REVENUE MODEL

>

ATTITUDE

TECHNOLOGICAL

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

  • Data holders tend to hesitate to share data

    Non-profit organisations make their data increasingly available for reuse while for-profit organisations hesitate to do so. Hindering factors are the costs and risks for data holders associated with making data available, lack of data reuse culture, and the difficulty to determine a fair price. Individuals fear losing control over personal data and invasion of their privacy. The success of the freemium model shows that the reticence to data reuse depends on what is given back to the customers.

  • Data holders tend to try to differentiate with regard to performance

    Value propositions of data economy actors, particularly of data processors, data users and data holders, frequently include terms such as ‘faster’, ‘better’ or ‘more’. Without doubt, performance is important in the context of big data. However, it is only one of several important factors and does not seem to be among the key challenge to be overcome. Additionally, it does not seem to be a good idea to use the same key element as most of the competitors do to create a lasting impression.

  • Data holders tend to focus on marketing-related applications

    Without doubt, there are hundreds of areas affected by data. In Europe, among for-profit organizations, there is a significant concentration of applications focusing on marketing-related data reuse. Marketing seems to be an area for which not only data reuse is highly relevant in theory but also one where data reuse is already happening a lot in practice, at data users as well as at data processors and holders. Multi-channel marketing, customer targeting or market analysis are typical examples.

  • Data holders tend to use customer-centric pricing

    Purchase decisions are typically made through an assessment of a myriad of factors balancing perceptions of value components against price in a subtle, complex, and often sub-conscious decision matrix. This equally applies for data processors, users, holders and distributors. In the data economy, customer-centric pricing leads, for instance, to the implementation of the premium model as well as to dual pricing, which are both used due to the difficulty to determine a fair price for data.

  • Data holders tend to restrict their activities to national markets

    The focus of actors on national markets is the result of lacking integration of the European market, despite of all the serious efforts made by EU policy makers. There are many differences between EU Member States that affect the general opportunities and dangers relevant for the day-to-day operations of data economy actors. Legal, socio-economic and technological differences increase the costs and complexity for an actor that is active on more than one European national market.

  • Data holders tend to hesitate to share data

    Data holders might often not share and utilise interesting and valuable data they possess due to technological restrictions e.g. it would be hard to extract, anonymise and share or the data resides within proprietary or outdated systems without export functionalities. However, an alternative may be the live-integration by providing an open API for other players however, this is connected also with additional technical hurdles such as ensuring high availability, bandwidth and security.

  • Data holders tend to benefit from defining the lifecycle of data

    An important quality criteria of data is its timeliness (in the big data context: volatility). It describes the length of time until the data is available to users. If a data is outdated it can still be used for history analysis but not for decision making. Timeliness is affected by how fast the ICT updates the data after an event happened and in which interval it makes updates. Providing a “best before date” or a best before condition to a data set would help data users to assess the quality of the data.

  • Data holders tend to benefit from the use of data quality certificates

    The use and reuse of data could be increased if certifications provided guarantee for data consumers regarding the quality of the data, which could lead to trust regarding the source and platforms, the data suppliers and the quality of the data itself. Research organisations need to meet several ISO standards regarding data management and security but other organisations don’t. Establishing trust regarding a company or its data-based product by using a certified product label could supplement it.

  • Data holders tend to be increasingly aware of security and privacy risks

    The lack of trust in big data technologies and data reuse is often linked to data protection and privacy related fears. Making all citizens aware of privacy and security rules would fill this gap but is not realistic. However, making companies that earn money with data-based services responsible for security and privacy might be a working solution. A seal of quality could offer a guarantee for privacy and protection of data. This may, however, increase the hesitation of companies to share data.

  • Data holders are hindered in sharing data due to missing de-facto standards and technical diversity.

    There are different types of ICT infrastructures, databases and interfaces that have been developed over time. Standards regarding technologies and processes of big data have not been fixed yet, which resulted partially competing standards. Concrete standards need to be clearer promoted at EU level to ensure the free flow of data (the end of rooming fee was the first step). In addition, making data available in unfavourable formats e.g. PDF risks that data can be combined and reused by others.

  • Data holders tend to reduce or avoid own ICT infrastructures

    Cloud-storage and cloud computing services guarantee a certain service quality when service-level agreements are signed, which identify responsibilities, rights and obligations between the service provider and the user. In the last years, the service-based approaches like infrastructure as a service or software as a service have become more and more popular. This allows companies to consume external ICT infrastructure and reduce the need to create and maintain an own ICT infrastructure.

  •  Data holders tend to hesitate to fully rely on services provided by third parties

    Using third-party services might lead to dependency. Dependency in terms of availability can be partly solved with SLAs, which describe a set of guarantees related to a service. SLAs in terms of data-driven services are not that common and need to be developed. Switching a vendor usually causes high switching costs for a customer, which might result vendor lock-ins. This might be critical in the data economy as very specific data might be offered only by few or even one holder.

  • Data holders tend to benefit from equivalency of transmission speed and Internet access structure all over Europe

    The high-speed broadband Internet network is a fundamental technical requirement of the data economy. The available average speed and guaranteed broadband connection in Europe depends on the national efforts which are influenced by regulations and straightforward guidelines of the EC. However, this issue seems to lose its importance the new fibre generation might make it relevant again.

  • Data holders tend to benefit from a reduction in the technological gap between SMEs and large enterprises

    The data economy is heterogenous. Big companies distinguish themselves by having large financial, human and material capacities, which result strategic advantage to them. SMEs on the contrary often lack in those resources and in the possibilities to cope with latest technology trends. To compensate this beside the governmental financial subsidies the wide spreading of cloud services might provide a solution, which allow SMEs to use latest technologies without hiring expensive consultants or expert staff.


·······>
·······>
·······>
·······>
···>
···>
···>
···>
···>
···>
···>
···>

EVOKE

BEHAVIOUR

USE

EVOKE

BEHAVIOUR

PURSUE

RESPOND

TO

INTERACT

WITH

SHAPE

OR

ENSURE

SHAPE

OR

ENSURE

SHAPE

OR

ENSURE

ENVIRONMENT

CONTACT

Project coordinator

Mr Daniel Bachlechner

Fraunhofer ISI

E-mail: daniel.bachlechner@isi.fraunhofer.de

 

Communication leader and liaison manager

Ms Klara Süveges-Heilingbrunner

ICT Association of Hungary

E-mail: hklara@ivsz.hu

 




CONTACT

Project coordinator

Mr Daniel Bachlechner

Fraunhofer ISI

E-mail: daniel.bachlechner@isi.fraunhofer.de

 

Communication leader and liaison manager

Ms Klara Süveges-Heilingbrunner

ICT Association of Hungary

E-mail: hklara@ivsz.hu